In a strong statement, Supreme Court lawyer and human rights activist Prashant Bhushan has condemned India’s decision to export arms to Israel, asserting that it equates to aiding genocide. Bhushan highlighted that Article 21 of the Indian Constitution, which guarantees the protection of life and personal liberty, is not confined to Indian citizens alone. He argued that the Constitution clearly states that the State of India cannot violate anyone’s rights under Article 21, regardless of whether they are citizens or non-citizens. This, he stressed, extends to India’s actions on the global stage, including its arms exports.
Bhushan’s remarks have ignited a broader discussion regarding India’s foreign policy and its impact on global human rights. Critics of the arms trade argue that these exports may indirectly contribute to civilian suffering in conflict zones, while proponents claim they are part of essential strategic alliances and defense partnerships.
The timing of Bhushan’s comments is particularly significant as they come amidst escalating violence in the Gaza Strip and the West Bank, where countless civilians have been affected. His statement serves as a call for India to reconsider the ethical implications of its defense exports, especially given the country’s historical stance on non-alignment and support for the Palestinian cause.
This issue underscores the complex relationship between national interests, international diplomacy, and moral obligations in global affairs.
